Great Event in Canada
April 14, 2010
This weekend I am speaking at a very cool event! And I would love to have you join me.
What: The Ultimate Success Event
When: Saturday April 17th, 2010 from 8am to 6:30pm
Where: Chateau Cartier Hotel close to downtown Ottawa Canada
But, to kick things off, the weekend starts Friday night with a private party that is totally free.
Peggy McColl is releasing her 7th book, “Viral Explosions,” and Friday is her book launch party. I have known Peggy for years, and she is an amazing woman with life changing books.
The party will be a blast. I will of course be there. There will be lots of entertainment, free hors d’oeuvres, beverages, and give-aways galore.
Then…after celebrating the launch of “Viral Explosions” on Friday night, Saturday is a full day celebration of your success.
The Ultimate Success Event, Saturday April 17, will be a jam packed, seminar featuring a stellar line up of 13 luminaries in the field of personal and business success coaching, including yours truly. I’ll be playing Personality Poker with the 250 people in attendance. Other speakers will talk about marketing, sales, personality development and much much more.
I hope to see you there!
L Vaughn Spencer
April 9, 2010
I have been ridiculously busy with the manuscript for the new book. As a result, my blogging has slowed down. So, for today’s entry, I want to share with you an interview between a good friend of mine and The Economist. I’m sure you will agree that L-Vo, as he likes to be called, is brilliant.
My Interview for Enterprise Leadership
March 23, 2010
A while back I was interviewed by Tom Parish at EnterpriseLeadership.org. On their site, you will find the following description:
In this podcast, Steve Shapiro, InnoCentive’s vice president of strategic consulting, talks about how InnoCentive’s open innovation model has helped companies solve the most challenging problems.
When the Oil Spill Recovery Institute in Alaska wanted to find out how to pump out the almost solidified oil at the bottom of Prince William Sound from the Exxon Valdez spill, the Institute did not turn to its researchers. Instead they posted a challenge to InnoCentive, an emerging company that specializes in open innovation also called crowdsourcing. According to The New York Times, the Institute paid John Davis, a chemist from Illinois, more than $20,000 for his idea. Davis, an expert on cement, figured that if vibrating cement can keep it from hardening, then a similar concept can be adapted to keep the oil in the tanks from freezing.
Founded in 1998 by three scientists working for Eli Lilly, the major pharmaceutical company, InnoCentive became an independent company in 2001. To date InnoCentive, companies, such as Dow Chemical and Procter & Gamble, and not-for-profits have posted more than 1,000 challenges on InnoCentive. Research areas include everything from business processes to chemistry. Steven Shapiro, InnoCentive’s vice president of strategic consulting, says that today corporations cannot depend on their internal research and development departments to solve their toughest problems. “They need to look at external resources. InnoCentive’s enables these organizations to tap into a global network of 200,000 solvers who enjoy the challenge of competing for a cash reward. Our partnership with the Rockefeller Foundation is helping to solve problems posted by not-for-profits working in poor countries.”
In this podcast, Shapiro explains the reasons for using open innovation to solve tough problems, InnoCentive’s business model for generating revenue, some of InnoCentive’s most successful challenges, the benefits of using InnoCentive, and the challenges this company faces in this economy.
You can listen to (or download) this podcast here.
Is Crowdsourcing Disruptive?
March 22, 2010
There was an excellent post by Hutch Carpenter on the blogging innovation website. In the article, he asked the question – “Is Crowdsourcing Disrupting the Design Industry?” He makes an excellent case for the value (and pitfalls) of crowdsourcing design work. As readers of this site know, I have used design crowdsourcing on several occasions.
In response to the article, I wrote…
I use crowdsourcing for some of my designs. And I have to admit, I do sometimes feel a little bad. It’s clear some people put a fair amount of thought into their designs. Sadly, there is typically only one winner.
Having said that, as a consultant, no one feels bad for me when I spend days or weeks developing a proposal that does not get awarded to me. We recognize that it is the cost of doing business.
Let’s face it…for some design work, it might be just as fast to develop a rough concept as it would be to develop a compelling proposal. Crowdsourcing can reduce the time and effort involved in selling design services.
And crowdsourcing, when done correctly, can give you (the “Seeker”) benefits that you would not get through conventional means.
Right now I am running a crowdsourcing competition for a design for my Personality Poker cards. The competition has been running for 2 days, and I received some amazing designs. Because I did a blind competition, everyone has to develop their own idea, rather than simply build on the idea of someone else. This is enhancing the level of creativity significantly.
The winner will get follow on work from me in fleshing out the concept and in future design work. [NOTE: The competition is over and I received 32 designs of which a half dozen of them were fantastic]
I used to use eLance (an eRFP site) for design work. But the results were not always great. Plus each designer has to submit a proposal and decide upon a fee. With 99designs, the designer knows the “prize” and can decide if they want to invest any effort at all.
It’s not spec work that is changing the rules. It is access to the masses. Personally, I would prefer to pay for a solution than a proposal.
I do think, if done well, design crowdsourcing can be beneficial to all involved.
Crowdsourcing has the potential to give designers a reach they have not previously had. Although their cost per design might go up, their cost of acquisition might actually go down. Proposals are a cost of doing business – and you don’t win every proposal. Spending time/money on finding customers who want the proposal in the first-place is another cost – and you don’t acquire every customer you target. Mailing marketing materials to potential customers is another real cost. The list goes on. The real cost/time associated with marketing/selling design services is not insignificant.
Crowdsourcing allows you to convert your marketing/selling time into design time. Your only cost is your time to develop the submitted designs. This feels like a much better use of design resources.
LG Electronics Open Innovation Competition
March 17, 2010
Last year, LG Electronics ran an open innovation competition in search of the next generation cell phone.
If you did not enter last year, you have another chance to win $20,000.
According to their press release…
LG Mobile Phones, the fastest growing mobile phone brand in North America, is partnering with crowdSPRING, an online marketplace for creative services, and Autodesk, a leader in 2D and 3D design, engineering, and entertainment software, to hold an innovative competition to define the future of mobile communication. Starting on March 15th, LG Mobile Phones will give consumers the chance to design their vision of the next revolutionary LG mobile phone and compete for more than $80,000 in prizes.
The competition will award over 40 winners. The first place winner will be awarded $20,000, one Wacom Intuos4 medium tablet, and Autodesk industrial design software. The second place winner will be awarded $10,000 and Autodesk SketchBook Pro software, and the third place winner will be awarded $5,000 and Autodesk SketchBook Pro software. To reward as many people as possible in the name of creativity, LG will also be giving out a whopping 37 honorable mentions at $1,000 each.
You can read all of the rules, and enter the competition, on the crowdSPRING website.
Last year, LG Electronics shared some of their insights with me. There were 835 submissions from 324 individuals. Of the ideas submitted, 25% were deemed “good.” I’ll be curious to see how they do this year.
I also hope to find out if anything was done with the winning solution(s) from last year’s competition. Although these competitions generate some nice PR, at the end of the day, the real value is derived through the implementation of innovation.
Good luck!
Do you have a question about making your company more innovative, leaner and competitive?
Contact Stephen directly at email: 