<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simple Not Simplistic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steveshapiro.com/2009/04/30/simple-not-simplistic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steveshapiro.com/2009/04/30/simple-not-simplistic/</link>
	<description>Steve shares his unconventional approach on Business Innovation, Creativity, Goals and Critical Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:12:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://www.steveshapiro.com/2009/04/30/simple-not-simplistic/#comment-35684</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveshapiro.com/?p=1752#comment-35684</guid>
		<description>Javier, thanks for your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Javier, thanks for your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier</title>
		<link>http://www.steveshapiro.com/2009/04/30/simple-not-simplistic/#comment-35677</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveshapiro.com/?p=1752#comment-35677</guid>
		<description>The article was very interesting especially the common innovation myths.
I realize that for example in engines yes to have more power and torque usually you need to have a bigger engine.  But you can use technology as supercharging, turbo charging, and variable valve timming, along with low weight, high compression and others and you will have a powerfull engine in a compact size. But of  course depending on the application. So that is a case in you can apply the bigger is not always better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article was very interesting especially the common innovation myths.<br />
I realize that for example in engines yes to have more power and torque usually you need to have a bigger engine.  But you can use technology as supercharging, turbo charging, and variable valve timming, along with low weight, high compression and others and you will have a powerfull engine in a compact size. But of  course depending on the application. So that is a case in you can apply the bigger is not always better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://www.steveshapiro.com/2009/04/30/simple-not-simplistic/#comment-35666</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveshapiro.com/?p=1752#comment-35666</guid>
		<description>Fred, thanks for your comment.  I like the distinction... &quot;needing a decision&quot; versus &quot;thinking there is an answer.&quot;  I think in reality there is no reality.  Therefore there is never AN answer...just a decision about which path to take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred, thanks for your comment.  I like the distinction&#8230; &#8220;needing a decision&#8221; versus &#8220;thinking there is an answer.&#8221;  I think in reality there is no reality.  Therefore there is never AN answer&#8230;just a decision about which path to take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://www.steveshapiro.com/2009/04/30/simple-not-simplistic/#comment-35663</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveshapiro.com/?p=1752#comment-35663</guid>
		<description>Thanks Luis. I don&#039;t think the correct answer is simplicity or complexity...it is the right tool for the right situation.  Sometimes we like to over-complicate things.  And other times we over-simplify.  And I totally agree with your point on distinguishing symptoms from root causes.  I have a whole series of blog entries on critical thinking that address these topics... http://www.steveshapiro.com/category/critical-thinking/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Luis. I don&#8217;t think the correct answer is simplicity or complexity&#8230;it is the right tool for the right situation.  Sometimes we like to over-complicate things.  And other times we over-simplify.  And I totally agree with your point on distinguishing symptoms from root causes.  I have a whole series of blog entries on critical thinking that address these topics&#8230; <a href="http://www.steveshapiro.com/category/critical-thinking/" rel="nofollow">http://www.steveshapiro.com/category/critical-thinking/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTLdom</title>
		<link>http://www.steveshapiro.com/2009/04/30/simple-not-simplistic/#comment-35658</link>
		<dc:creator>PTLdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveshapiro.com/?p=1752#comment-35658</guid>
		<description>Be careful, don&#039;t get for granted simplistic generalizations. In lots of cases the problem is not the problem but the symptom. Maybe it&#039;s time to start a new era of &quot;complexification&quot;, as our wourld was born complex, to extract the patterns that will differentiate the achievable solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful, don&#8217;t get for granted simplistic generalizations. In lots of cases the problem is not the problem but the symptom. Maybe it&#8217;s time to start a new era of &#8220;complexification&#8221;, as our wourld was born complex, to extract the patterns that will differentiate the achievable solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred H Schlegel</title>
		<link>http://www.steveshapiro.com/2009/04/30/simple-not-simplistic/#comment-35633</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred H Schlegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 01:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveshapiro.com/?p=1752#comment-35633</guid>
		<description>Your point about data is well put.  In addition to looking in the wrong place for inspiration, you can get trapped into thinking there is &#039;an answer&#039; rather than realizing what you need is &#039;a decision.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your point about data is well put.  In addition to looking in the wrong place for inspiration, you can get trapped into thinking there is &#8216;an answer&#8217; rather than realizing what you need is &#8216;a decision.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

